-
Home
Military Compensation SRCA Manuals and Resources Library
Liability Handbook
Ch 9 Defining the 'Injury'
9.2 Need for Clear and Accurate Diagnosis
- 9.2.7 Delegates rights to examine VEA files on client
External
RCG Delegates may also seek those ADF medical documents c — ontemporary with injury and also pre-existing post discharge medical assessments from DVA's files relating to the employee's claims under the VEA.
- Delegates may establish from the DVA database 'VIEW' whether the employee has a claim under the VEA also. Where this is the case, the relevant ADF medical documents and also medical reports commissioned by VEA Delegates may resolve medical issues – including diagnosis – relevant to the SRCA claim.
- RCG Delegates have the right of reasonable access to VEA f — iles, and are not prohibited from such a search by the terms of the Privacy Act because:
- The Authority signed by the employee on the claim form D2020 is sufficient to allow this level of access.
- Furthermore, access is permissible via Exceptions to Pr — ivacy Principle 10:
- RCG is part of the same agency that collected the information.
- The use is the same i.e. determining compensation entitlements of veterans.
- Disclosure by VEA Delegates is reasonably necessary to protect revenue.
Nevertheless, h — aving obtained access to a VEA file dealing with the same injury, Delegates should use some caution in determining liability under a worker's compensation Act using medical data gathered for the purposes of separate legislation. The Acts have different ac — c — eptance criteria and the focus of attention on medical issues is quite different in some cases.
- Copies (or originals) of the ADF medical documents on VEA files present few problems of interpretation for RCG Delegates.
- However, medical reports commiss — ioned by VEA Delegates or by representatives of ex-service organisations for the purposes of determining liability under the VEA can be misleading to RCG Delegates. RCG Delegates should be guarded regarding conclusions or opinions expressed by medical pro — f — essionals about the relationship of the injury/disease to service, which is judged by different criteria under the VEA. RCG Delegates should instead be looking to glean:
- a medical diagnosis
- the medical detail of the reports i.e. medical observations capable of corroborating/ contradicting or clarifying other medical sources
- dates, circumstances and other narrative details revealed to the VEA medical examiner but not volunteered as evidence to the RCG Delegate e.g. assertions that the injury/disease was the result of Vietnam service (thus not compensable under the SRCA) which contradicts the tale told to the RCG Delegate.