Fact 532 - Prejudice
|
532 |
the Department of Veterans Affairs would be prejudiced by the client's failure to comply with the section 53 notice provisions |
Prejudice
Relevance of this question
Prejudice to the Department of Defence
Case examples
References
Source URL: https://clik.dva.gov.au/military-compensation-reference-library/historical-information/defcare-commentary-january-2003/initial-liability/fact-532-prejudice
Relevance of this question
|
532 |
the Department of Veterans Affairs would be prejudiced by the client's failure to comply with the section 53 notice provisions |
Prejudice
Relevance of this question
Prejudice to the Department of Defence
Case examples
References
Source URL: https://clik.dva.gov.au/military-compensation-reference-library/historical-information/defcare-commentary-january-2003/initial-liability/fact-532-prejudice/relevance-question
Prejudice to the Department of Defence
|
532 |
the Department of Veterans Affairs would be prejudiced by the client's failure to comply with the section 53 notice provisions |
Prejudice
Relevance of this question
Prejudice to the Department of Defence
Case examples
References
Source URL: https://clik.dva.gov.au/military-compensation-reference-library/historical-information/defcare-commentary-january-2003/initial-liability/fact-532-prejudice/prejudice-department-defence
References
|
532 |
the Department of Veterans Affairs would be prejudiced by the client's failure to comply with the section 53 notice provisions |
Prejudice
Relevance of this question
Prejudice to the Department of Defence
Case examples
References
Source URL: https://clik.dva.gov.au/military-compensation-reference-library/historical-information/defcare-commentary-january-2003/initial-liability/fact-532-prejudice/references